What the Ban on Campaign Finance Is about
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be valuable for you to go for the services of a top lawyer in the event that you want to present such a big case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.